Bartender Girl
BartenderGirl Services & Products Bartenders
About BartenderGirl Contact BartenderGirl.Com Frequently Asked Questions to BartenderGirl BartenderGirl Drink of the Month BartenderGirl Reservation
Bartenders in Los Angeles
zerpa BJZerpa

Why Is My Bartender Wearing Gloves?

Beginning July 01, you will see us wearing gloves, we tried to extent our six month period. But we will wearing gloves after July 01, so don't freak out it is the law.

New Yearís Day 2014 brought hundreds of new laws into effect in California. Everything from new gun regulations to laws on fracking and hands-free texting for teens went on the books. Tucked among them was AB 1252, which codified Section 113961 of the California Retail Food Code. The new law requires any food worker who touches raw, cooked or ďready-to-eatĒ food, from a master sushi chef to a prep cook to the guy cutting a lemon to put in your vodka and tonic, to wear disposable gloves. This is similar to laws in many other states, but none as big as California.

Itís not a surprise that many restaurant staffers and chefs were upset about it. Many spoke freely about how the law would impede their ability to cook and present food the way theyíre used to. Some complained about their tactile contact with food being impeded. Many bartenders were especially upset, feeling that wearing disposable gloves will ruin the burgeoning cocktail renaissance going on around the state. Even though the state has allowed a six month roll-out of the law, itís clear many people feel itís unnecessary and potentially harmful.

But change is upsetting, even if itís positive change. And certainly, everyone wants to do everything within reason to prevent food-borne illnesses. And if wearing gloves saves people from sickness and possible long-lasting harm, isnít it worth it?

When faced with a new piece of legislation related to a scientific or medical matter, itís important to be skeptical, but not just for the sake complaining about it (though that can be quite cathartic).

And good skepticism means asking the right questions about it. Is the law necessary? Is it a solution to a problem thatís not a problem? Is it scientifically sound? Does solid research back it up? Was it passed with the right intentions, or to satisfy a certain interest group? Who benefits and how?

Again, letís start with the baseline that food-borne illnesses are bad. And using gloves when handling food is helpful, when done in tandem with good hand washing. But laws that are pointless, confusing, not needed and/or based on bad science are not good. And in the case of AB 1252, itís not clear that any answer to any of the above questions merits the lawís existence. In fact, itís entirely possible that the law will do more harm than good, and exacerbate the very problem it was written to solve.

For one thing, a host of difficult issues come with it. The law is incredibly confusing and lacks clarity on who should be following it and why. It seems written mostly for fast food workers, yet other language makes it uncertain if it applies to anyone except those serving ďa highly susceptible population.Ē It promotes massive waste, forcing restaurants to go through box after box of environmentally unfriendly single-use gloves. There arenít clear guidelines on who needs to wear gloves and who doesnít. Itís also going to be virtually impossible to enforce, unless California is keen on sending health inspectors into every place of business that sells food on a momentís notice.

But the biggest problem with AB 1252 is that it doesnít really do anything to stop food-borne illness that kitchen best practices already donít. Anyone who touches food should already be vigorously washing their hands with hot water and soap, as well as keeping raw meat or chicken away from raw vegetables or fruits.

The vast majority of prep cooks, chefs and bartenders at reputable restaurants are doing this, not because itís the law, but because itís the hygienic thing to do. Likewise, anyone who cooks at home should also be doing this, and almost half of all food poisoning comes from home cooks making themselves sick. No law can do anything about that.

In fact, if you wanted to reduce the likelihood of food poisoning or illness, forcing food handlers and cooks to wear disposable gloves might be one of the last things youíd want to do. A 2010 study from the Journal of Food Protection says as much, stating in its abstract that:

[W]hen properly used, gloves can substantially reduce opportunities for food contamination. However, gloves have limitations and may become a source of contamination if they are punctured or improperly used. Experiments conducted in clinical and dental settings have revealed pinhole leaks in gloves. Although such loss of glove integrity can lead to contamination of foods and surfaces, in the food industry improper use of gloves is more likely than leakage to lead to food contamination and outbreaks. [Ö] Occlusion of the skin during long-term glove use in food operations creates the warm, moist conditions necessary for microbial proliferation and can increase pathogen transfer onto foods through leaks or exposed skin or during glove removal. The most important issue is that glove use can create a false sense of security, resulting in more high-risk behaviors that can lead to cross-contamination when employees are not adequately trained.

Itís absurd to expect that food handlers are going to be able to change their gloves for every meal they prepare, especially at peak dining times. And those gloves are going to carry food particles from plate to plate and meal to meal, creating a mass transit system for microbes. In addition, gloves get hot and sweaty, and when they puncture or tear, contamination becomes likely.

Also, food preparation itself isnít the only source of food contamination. Unclean utensils, improper cooking temperatures and contaminated food itself sicken as many people as poor hygiene does. And this new law doesnít address any of those.

AB 1252 passed the California State assembly and senate unanimously, and it doesnít appear there was any particular lobbying done for it. Itís not a power grab by Big Glove or the globalist controllers. Itís a law meant to protect people, and tries to do so in good faith. But it also appears to be unnecessary, inconsistent, confusing and potentially harmful. Given the findings of reputable research, along with the lawís seemingly arbitrary nature, itís reasonable to think it wonít end up protecting anyone. Assuming itís followed to the letter (which it wonít be), it might actually make more people sick.

Not all laws warrant skepticism, but this one does. And the more I look into it, the more skeptical I get. From a scientific point of view, AB 1252 simply seems like a solution that creates more problems.

BartenderGirl ô  serve the greater Los Angeles area including, Beach Communities, Orange County, San Diego County, Palm Springs, Palm Dessert and the Inland Empire! View Map.

All of our staff are T.I.P.S., ABC L.E.A.D.S certified, ABC licensed, screened, and insured. ô bartending services
Bartender Services - Call us: 800-665-0804
Bartending Services for Southern California
About Call us 1-800-665-0804 Drink of the Month Reserve our services Frenquently Asked Questions Make a deposit or payment

Trademark and Copyright Notice BartenderGirlģ, and its related entities. All rights reserved.
Professional Bartending Service & Catering Services for Southern California area. 1-800-665-0804
Use of this Web site assumes acceptance of the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Are you looking for? BartenderGirlģ Jobs Opportunities,
The BartenderGirlģ T-Shirt or Bartending Training Course. Register Here